Update October 3, 2024: Fenchak V Penn State BOT

  • Post last modified:

This coming Tuesday, October 8, 2024, there will be an evidentiary hearing in Judge Marshall’s courtroom in the Centre County Courthouse Annex at 9:30 am. The public may attend, and if you are in the area this might be a very interesting morning.

Judge Marshall has scheduled this hearing so that we can present evidence why our Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction to stop the Penn State Board of Trustees from holding a vote on my permanent dismissal and ban for life from the Board of Trustees on Thursday, October 10th. Penn State will be present to defend the Board of Trustees intent to remove me, and why it is in no way retaliation.

You can read our Preliminary Motion: Brief in Support of
Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction here. Penn State’s reply is due Monday, and I will post it on my website.

Our legal team of Attorneys Terry Mutchler and Justin J. Boehret will be there, as will I. Your support means a lot, and I appreciate it.

Centre County Courthouse Annex:

102 S Allegheny St
Bellefonte, PA 16823

(Google location)

Judge Marshall’s courtroom is directly across the street from the main Centre County Courthouse in Bellefonte, and next to the Dominos Pizza.

Time: The hearing is scheduled for 9:30 am, Tuesday October 8th.

Parking: There is metered street parking, and some municipal lots. Do not park on streets with red lined curbs.

Security: Please be prepared to pass through security screening.

barry fenchak centre county courthouse annex
Centre County Courthouse Annex, 102 S Allegheny Street, Bellefonte PA 16823

This case is moving very quickly. Penn State has seen how strong our case is and added two more lawyers to their team. Expenses are escalating and your support has been crucial. It’s now obvious Penn State will stop at nothing to shut down any legal challenges to their illegal actions, and we’re here to protect the rights of the alumni and the future of the university.

We are 63% of the way to our goal of raising $20,000 for legal expenses on GoFundMe. If you have already donated, thank you. If you have the means to do so and want to see Penn State back in the hands of trustees who understand legal university governance, your donation will go to a very good cause. Whether or not you have the means to contribute personally, please help us spread the word and forward the GoFundMe information to all the Penn Staters in your circle.

Our friend, alumnus Andrew Shaffer, wrote an excellent Op-Ed for StateCollege.com that I’m reprinting below (with permission). It ran during Homecoming Weekend and I understand it got a lot of attention and had many alumni asking questions.

Community Letters - September 29, 2024

Andrew Shaffer, StateCollege.com

Penn State’s $4.57 billion endowment is invested under the supervision of a small group called the Penn State Investment Council. The council’s activities are very closely held, and most of Penn State’s Board receives only summary information about the endowment.

According to Penn State, the university paid 1.86% in investment expenses and advisor fees on its endowment in 2022-23 — or ~$85 million. Moreover, this 1.86% expense rate is a significant decrease from the 2.49% rate the university was paying when it first began reporting expenses using normalized industry metrics in 2019 (see Exhibit A-1 on p. 25). From at least 2008 onwards, the university has been paying expenses at least an order of magnitude greater than those of the best publicly available passively managed investments (e.g. Vanguard’s no-load S&P 500 index fund has a 0.04% expense ratio).

Paying high expenses might be worthwhile if they yielded superior returns, but they have not. If the university had invested its endowment entirely in a S&P 500 index fund since 2008, its endowment would now be at least $2.3 billion (i.e. 50%) larger.

Penn State alumni-elected trustee Barry Fenchak has requested information about the investments in Penn State’s endowment so he can assess whether they are suitable for purpose and free from conflicts of interest. Addressing these questions is part of every Penn State Trustee’s fiduciary responsibilities. Nevertheless, the leaders of Penn State’s board have repeatedly denied Mr. Fenchak’s requests, and it has become necessary for Mr. Fenchak to file a lawsuit to obtain the information necessary to do his job. Penn State is now using university resources to defend against this lawsuit and keep the investments held in its endowment secret.

Penn State’s secrecy is especially concerning in light of a pattern of deliberate steps the university has taken to reduce its transparency and accountability. Penn State’s board has been plausibly accused of regularly conducting university business in off-the-record meetings, potentially in violation of Pennsylvania’s open meetings law. In 2017, after losing another lawsuit to trustees seeking information, the university changed its bylaws to prevent reimbursement of legal fees to trustees who sue the university seeking information — even if the university is in the wrong. 

Earlier this summer, the university further changed its bylaws to eliminate the independence of the alumni-elected trustees altogether by requiring board approval of alumni trustee candidates before they can appear on the election ballot, prohibiting trustees from publicly speaking in opposition to board decisions and effectively enabling the board’s leaders to unilaterally remove any member who opposes them. 

After Mr. Fenchak’s lawsuit was filed, the Board prohibited Mr. Fenchak from attending board meetings in person. Three weeks ago, citing the recently updated bylaws, the board’s governance committee unanimously voted to recommend removing Mr. Fenchak from the Board — although it is far from clear that the allegations against him warrant immediate removal.  Two weeks ago, it was disclosed that Penn State is also investigating alumni-elected trustee Anthony Lubrano for public statements regarding the university. Mr. Lubrano has been threatened with sanctions if he discloses the findings of the university’s investigation.

Penn State is Pennsylvania’s foremost public university, and the actions of its leadership should be thoroughly transparent and avoid any appearance of impropriety. Changes to restore transparency and accountability to Penn State’s board must be enacted now, before the current alumni-elected trustees are replaced by others who have been hand-picked by the board’s leadership. Ultimately, replacing the entire membership of the board may be the only way to restore public confidence.

Please let Penn State’s leaders know you want them to restore the transparency of its board and the independence of its alumni-elected trustees by emailing President Bendapudi and the board — and consider making your future donations to Penn State contingent upon the university making these changes.

Additionally, please make a donation to Mr. Fenchak’s legal fund so he can win his lawsuit and complete his review of Penn State’s finances. Mr. Fenchak’s review of the university’s finances may be our last opportunity to disclose and correct any potential conflicts of interest or other impairments to Penn State’s governance for a very long time.

Andrew Shaffer,
State College

As a member of the Penn State Board of Trustees, I will from time to time be made aware of certain confidential information. Any public opinions or statements made now or in the past are from me, individually, and not by or on behalf of the Board of Trustees. I will also engage with Trustees and administrators in private, off-the-record conversations, with the expectation of privacy on both parties. I take these expectations seriously, as they are required in order to catalyze important discussions. As a fiduciary, it is also important that I engage in conversations with all stakeholders of the University. Stakeholders like you.  Discussions will involve publicly available information and issues before the Board, as well as my personal thoughts, concerns, and ideas. I also will continue to solicit your thoughts, concerns, and ideas, and plan to engage in meaningful conversations with you on those topics. I hope that you will continue to share your concerns and ideas with me on my contact page.